To consider that these submerged systems were carved by subsurface processes finds its historical equivalent in the theory that celestial bodies orbit Earth. Not just that, but it is also the confusion of cause and effect: whatever turbidity flows that have been observed in/near these structures are post-submersion consequences and certainly not the creation mechanism. Such explanations illustrate the practice of fitting observations to theory, which is anti-science they are but ad hoc speculations crafted to eliminate apparent conflict with the prevailing paradigm. Yet geologists believe that they were, and it has prompted me to call them out because they are fitting the creation of these structures into their ‘no flood, ever’ paradigm. The heart of the issue is that new map data reveal submerged, former river systems that could not have been created by subsurface processes. In that presentation I incorporated evidence from the local region that support the assertion that there was a worldwide flood. The email is followed by several items from a presentation that I gave to a group in California in September 2015. I apologize for its length, but it should be worth your time. I recently shared it with several prominent geologists. Please see the email, below, marked as item 1.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |